Join the Footballguys Daily Update
Start your morning with our roundup of the most important stories in football - with the fantasy insight you need to make league-winning decisions. Delivered straight to your inbox, 100% free.
Free This Week!
As part of our ongoing effort to get our great content to more people, Footballguys has decided to make this article FREE this week to Insiders. So for the low price of your e-mail address, you get to read this entire article free of charge.
Coming off Thanksgiving, it's appropriate to thank my readers and all our Footballguys subscribers. I can't believe it's already Week 13. Thanks so much for enjoying the ride of another great NFL and fantasy football season with us!
Because of this special occasion, I'm introducing a new section to the column. It's called "How Will They Score" and is at the bottom of the article. Note that the goal of this column is to provide data to help you make fantasy decisions but also actionable commentary from the stats provided.
Graphics Tutorial and Reader's Guide
I've gotten feedback that my graphics aren't as self-explanatory and intuitive as I think they are, so I provided a guide at the beginning of a past version of this article.
- Green text is a good matchup for that team's offensive players.
- Red text is a bad matchup.
- All reference to fantasy points assumes DraftKings scoring rules unless otherwise specified.
- All stats reference the full 2017 season unless otherwise specified.
This week, we'll discuss the following topics:
- Follow the Targets
- Funnel Watch
- The Weakest Links
- Hi, I'm New Here
- New England Patriots (at Buffalo Bills)
- Los Angeles Chargers (vs. Cleveland Browns)
- Los Angeles Rams (at Arizona Cardinals)
- Seattle Seahawks (vs. Philadelphia Eagles)
- Minnesota Vikings (at Atlanta Falcons)
- How Will They Score?
Follow the Targets
The table below looks at bad pass defenses and shows how those defenses allow targets, yards, and touchdowns. In previous weeks, we've looked at the eight worst pass defenses by yards per game over the course of the season. But with trends and teams changing, we narrowed that look to the most passing yards per game allowed from Week 7 forward. The numbers on how they've allowed those targets, yards, and touchdowns, however, are a season-long look.
Here are some quick notes on how to decipher the chart:
- Tampa Bay allows 64.3% of their targets to wide receivers, and they're last in the NFL in yards per game yielded to wide receivers
- They've surrendered 14 touchdowns to wideouts.
- The New York Giants have yielded nine (9) touchdowns to tight ends.
- Houston allows 24.6% of its total targets and the seventh-most (i.e. 26th-ranked) yards per game to tight ends.
- However, they only allow 17.4% of their targets and the fourth-fewest yards per game to running backs.
| Team | RB Tgt% | Yds/Gm Rank | TD | WR Tgt% | Yds/Gm Rank | TD | TE Tgt% | Yds/Gm Rank | TD |
| Green Bay Packers | 23.2% | 23 | 3 | 59.7% | 29 | 13 | 17.1% | 3 | 1 |
| Houston Texans | 17.4% | 4 | 3 | 58.0% | 27 | 13 | 24.6% | 26 | 6 |
| New York Giants | 19.8% | 14 | 2 | 55.4% | 23 | 10 | 24.7% | 30 | 9 |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 20.1% | 18 | 2 | 64.3% | 32 | 14 | 15.6% | 6 | 3 |
| Oakland Raiders | 23.8% | 25 | 4 | 54.9% | 16 | 11 | 21.3% | 22 | 4 |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 22.4% | 15 | 1 | 54.0% | 8 | 9 | 23.6% | 8 | 2 |
| Dallas Cowboys | 20.4% | 25 | 2 | 59.3% | 22 | 15 | 20.4% | 20 | 4 |
| Chicago Bears | 19.9% | 6 | 1 | 57.7% | 10 | 10 | 22.4% | 18 | 3 |
Action(able) Items
- I was ready to call Tampa Bay at Green Bay a sneaky shootout, but Tampa Bay lost two very good offensive linemen to I.R. this week.
- We've picked on Tampa Bay vs. wide receivers in this column multiple times this season. In fact, last week, our cover boy made us proud. Later, we'll look at them again and how it relates to Green Bay's receivers.
- The Giants held Vernon Davis to nothing on Thanksgiving, but that is likely an anomaly. Considering Oakland's lack of receiver depth and his success already this year, Jared Cook is in a great spot to outproduce expectations.
Funnel Watch
A "funnel" defense is one with a stout run defense but a suspect (or worse) pass defense. These units "funnel" production to the exterior and deep parts of the field (places where passing games focus) and away from the short middle (where the running game occurs).
| Team | PaYd/Gm | RuYd/Gm | NYd/Att | Yd/Rush | %PassYd | %RushYd |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 284.6 | 110.9 | 7.6 | 4.1 | 72.0% | 28.0% |
| Indianapolis Colts | 266.3 | 109.5 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 70.9% | 29.1% |
| Oakland Raiders | 244.8 | 108.8 | 7.1 | 4.1 | 69.2% | 30.8% |
| Green Bay Packers | 244.1 | 107.1 | 6.9 | 3.8 | 69.5% | 30.5% |
| Houston Texans | 243.9 | 96.3 | 6.9 | 3.8 | 71.7% | 28.3% |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 226.5 | 65.1 | 5.4 | 3.5 | 77.7% | 22.3% |
I've mentioned before that some "funnel" defenses are such because they are very good vs. the run and/or bad vs. the pass. Others make this list because game situations dictate more passing than rushing. This increases the passing stats against and decreases the rushing stats against. Because of this, it can be good to look at situation-neutral stats.
Defenses facing the pass-heaviest playcalling while in neutral game scripts during the last month:
— Pat Thorman (@Pat_Thorman) November 29, 2017
TEN 69.2%
GB 64.6%
CAR 63.6%
OAK 62.6%
ARZ 60.8%
NE 60.7%
Most run-heavy:
DEN 52.3%
DET 50.6%
SF 50.3%
CLE 49.3%
PHI 48.5%
CHI 48.1%
Teams like Green Bay and Oakland are "funnels" because they're very bad against the pass. A team like Philadelphia, though, has gained its status in the table above due to game script.
"Runnel" Defense
The funnel effect can also happen in reverse, where a team is very good against the pass but poor against the run (hence, "runnel" defense). Side note: I didn't create this term; I saw it on Twitter last season, but I can't recall who posted it. If you know, drop me a line so I can give proper credit.
| Team | PaYd/Gm | RuYd/Gm | NYd/Att | Yd/Rush | %PassYd | %RushYd |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 168.7 | 113.1 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 59.9% | 40.1% |
| Baltimore Ravens | 189.9 | 115.8 | 5.4 | 4.0 | 62.1% | 37.9% |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 203.8 | 126.6 | 5.4 | 4.0 | 61.7% | 38.3% |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 206.0 | 133.5 | 5.5 | 4.9 | 60.7% | 39.3% |
| Los Angeles Rams | 212.7 | 123.3 | 5.8 | 4.7 | 63.3% | 36.7% |
Action(able) Items
- If you play Monday Night Football DFS slates or traditional leagues, LeVeon Bell is worth paying up for. Not only is Cincinnati worse against the run than the pass, but Pittsburgh plays a more run-centric style on the road.
- Adrian Peterson is a dart-throw GPP play in DFS. The Rams could be in a let-down spot after a big win over New Orleans. Peterson has been effective in neutral and positive scripts.
The Weakest Links
Last Week, we discussed Kansas City vs. running quarterbacks. After allowing 27 rushing yards to Tyrod Taylor, they have now allowed 20+ rushing yards to a quarterback six times. We also discussed Tampa Bay vs. wide receivers. Let's get another look at that table:
| Player | Wk | Rec | Yd | TD | FPs |
| Julio Jones | 12 | 12 | 253 | 2 | 53.8 |
| Mohamed Sanu | 12 | 8 | 64 | 0 | 20.4 |
| Kenny Stills | 11 | 7 | 180 | 1 | 34.0 |
| Jarvis Landry | 11 | 6 | 95 | 1 | 20.5 |
| DeVante Parker | 11 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 6.6 |
| Robby Anderson | 10 | 4 | 85 | 1 | 18.5 |
| Jermaine Kearse | 10 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 7.5 |
| Ted Ginn | 9 | 4 | 59 | 1 | 15.9 |
| Michael Thomas | 9 | 8 | 65 | 0 | 14.5 |
Julio Jones broke the color-shading system in the "FPs" column. By putting up 53.8 DraftKings points, he made games of 18-10 look "ho-hum" and games of 14 and 15 look "whatever." This week, Tampa Bay gets Green Bay, so let's dive into which Packers wideout is the best start.
| Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | |||||||||
| Player | Snaps | Tgt | Yds | Snaps | Tgt | Yds | Snaps | Tgt | Yds | Snaps | Tgt | Yds |
| Davante Adams | 94.9% | 26.3% | 21.6% | 81.8% | 33.3% | 42.5% | 95.5% | 28.6% | 52.7% | 87.3% | 34.6% | 33.5% |
| Jordy Nelson | 83.1% | 18.4% | 14.3% | 97.0% | 16.7% | 9.4% | 92.5% | 17.1% | 10.0% | 94.5% | 19.2% | 4.5% |
| Randall Cobb | 83.1% | 13.2% | 23.7% | 56.1% | 16.7% | 24.5% | 71.6% | 17.1% | 14.2% | 69.1% | 15.4% | 23.7% |
| Team Total | 59 | 38 | 245 | 66 | 24 | 212 | 67 | 35 | 239 | 55 | 26 | 245 |
That's a lot of numbers jammed into one table, but the colors are enough to illustrate the Davante Adams is the clear WR1 in Green Bay lately. Going back to Brett Hundley's first game where he entered in relief of Aaron Rodgers, the story is the same. Adams has been the apple of Hundley's eye, and he gets a mouth-watering matchup this week. Adams is a reasonable cash play in DFS if you can't spare the couple hundred dollars more to get up to Michael Thomas, Devin Funchess, or Mike Evans (DraftKings pricing referenced).
Historically Bad
Football Outsiders ran an article this week illustrating some of this season's worst defenses against the worst defenses they've ever tracked.
| WORST RUN OFFENSE DVOA, 1986-2017 | WORST PASS DEFENSE DVOA, 1986-2017 | |||||
| Year | Team | DVOA | Year | Team | DVOA | |
| 2017 (11 G) | ARI | -34.10% | 2015 | NO | 48.10% | |
| 1991 | IND | -30.20% | 1996 | BAL | 42.00% | |
| 2017 (11 G) | MIA | -31.20% | 2017 (11 G) | OAK | 41.90% | |
| 2005 | ARI | -29.10% | 1999 | SF | 41.70% | |
| 2002 | HOU | -27.40% | 1996 | ATL | 38.00% | |
| 2013 | BAL | -27.20% | 2017 (11 G) | MIA | 37.20% | |
| 2013 | JAC | -27.10% | 2009 | DET | 36.50% | |
| 2016 | LARM | -26.60% | 1989 | DAL | 36.40% | |
| 1986 | NE | -26.50% | 2016 | DET | 36.20% | |
| 1995 | ARI | -25.10% | 2009 | JAC | 35.80% | |
| 2015 | WAS | -23.50% | 1991 | LARM | 35.40% | |
| 2016 | MIN | -23.30% | 2000 | MIN | 35.20% | |
The left side shows the worst offenses, but let's focus on the right side, where Oakland and Miami have been among the worst teams in history against the pass. And since Miami can't run the ball offensively, they don't sustain drives, thus putting their bad defense back on the field more often. This may not be the most actionable piece of advice this week because Miami is playing Denver, and Oakland is playing the Geno Smith-led New York Giants. But if looking for contrarian DFS options, Denver might be a good place to start. Both Demaryius Thomas and Emmanuel Sanders have appeal due to talent and matchup. And if you think Smith can be competent, Evan Engram and Sterling Shepard should continue to see volume.
Hi, I'm New Here
Let's take a look at some newly-developing trends.
Houston, We Have a Problem
| Player | Wk | Cmp | Att | Yd | TD | Int | FPs |
| Joe Flacco | 12 | 20 | 32 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 9.8 |
| Blaine Gabbert | 11 | 22 | 34 | 257 | 3 | 2 | 21.6 |
| Jared Goff | 10 | 25 | 37 | 355 | 3 | 0 | 29.5 |
| Jacoby Brissett | 9 | 20 | 30 | 308 | 2 | 0 | 23.5 |
| Russell Wilson | 8 | 26 | 41 | 452 | 4 | 1 | 39.1 |
| Kevin Hogan | 6 | 20 | 37 | 140 | 1 | 3 | 10.2 |
| Alex Smith | 5 | 29 | 37 | 324 | 3 | 0 | 29.9 |
The two quarterbacks who have failed recently against Houston are the two struggling the most this season. This week, Marcus Mariota gets Houston. Mariota isn't having a great year either, but positive touchdown regression should be on his side soon.
You Didn't Think This Would Last All Season, Did You?
New England's defense started the season on a historically bad pace. While the won't be confused with the '85 Bears any time soon, they've leveled out nicely.
Patriots have not allowed more than 17 points in a game since Week 4. But back in September I was told they're the worst defense in NFL history.
— Adam Levitan (@adamlevitan) November 27, 2017
For the first time this season, the Patriots are no longer ranked 32nd in Total Defense.
— Ben Volin (@BenVolin) November 28, 2017
They are now 30th after Sunday's win over the Dolphins. And they are up to 11th in points allowed. Major, major progress.
After allowing 300+ passing yards in each of first 6 games and multiple pass TDs in 5 of first 6, #Patriots defense hasn't allowed more than 237 yards, 1 TD in 5 games since. pic.twitter.com/O2QbUYzjkQ
— Chris Raybon (@ChrisRaybon) November 29, 2017
New England Patriots (at Buffalo Bills)
Commentary
New England's running back usage is a fantasy factor every season. They're such a good team that they can turn any back into a fantasy asset due to positive game scripts. And this matchups has historically been a fast-paced, high-scoring affair. But deciding which back to deploy in your lineup is the hard part. Last week, both Rex Burkhead and Dion Lewis were viable. Yet, if Lewis gets the short touchdowns this week instead of Burkhead, he holds most of the fantasy value.
It's likely that at least one touchdowns comes on the ground. Buffalo is allowing 36.9% of its total points via rushing touchdowns, the highest such ratio in the NFL. If you own Lewis in a traditional league, it's hard to imagine you have better options this week. Burkhead is a wild card, high-floor/low-ceiling play I'd only recommend in DFS GPPs or if you're a big underdog in your traditional league matchup.
Additionally, there's this nugget about Rob Gronkowski, who is always a candidate for at least one touchdown when New England has a high team total.
Rob Gronkowski, who is from Buffalo, has played 6 career games @ BUF. His stat lines:
— Evan Silva (@evansilva) November 27, 2017
5/109/1
7/113/1
7/94/0
5/104/1
7/109/2
4/54/2
Los Angeles Chargers (vs. Cleveland Browns)
Commentary
Cleveland had been in the "Funnel" section of this column for weeks, but they've been poor against the run lately. They have yielded over 100 yards to an individual back in two straight games and a rushing touchdown in three of their last four. They also allow 2.0 passing touchdowns per game, tied for second-most in the NFL. Meanwhile, Philip Rivers has thrown for multiple touchdowns in three straight games and four out of his last five.
Cleveland allows 45.7% of its total points via passing touchdowns, the 10th-highest ratio in the NFL. The Chargers score 48.2% of their total points via passing touchdowns, the eight-highest ratio in the NFL. Keenan Allen has been white-hot lately, but on paper, this matchup doesn't look good for wide receivers.
Los Angeles Rams (at Arizona Cardinals)
Commentary
By now, we all know that Patrick Peterson is a force at limiting (or stopping) fantasy production from opposing WR1s. But other receivers have had success against the Cardinals. The game logs of receivers vs. Arizona show as much. Peterson is likely to shadow Sammy Watkins, and Robert Woods likely to miss another week. That leaves slot man Cooper Kupp and rookie receiver Josh Reynolds.
Last week, Kupp led the team with 11 targets, while Reynolds had 6. In Week 7 vs. Arizona, Kupp saw 10 targets and caught 4 passes for 51 yards and 1 touchdown. In traditional leagues, Kupp is a flex-worthy starter. But in DFS, I'd rather have 6 Reynolds targets at his salary than 11 from Kupp. On DraftKings, Reynolds is $2,900 cheaper.
Arizona allows 3.7 yards per rush attempt, sixth-fewest in the NFL, making Todd Gurley a volume and game script-dependent option. With less expensive options in better matchups, Gurley isn't an elite cash game play this week.
Seattle Seahawks (vs. Philadelphia Eagles)
Commentary
This game is so intriguing. From a real football perspective, it's two teams with playoff and championship hopes. It's also two capable offenses going against two capable defenses, which brings us to the fantasy angle. We all know Seattle has no running game. Against Philadelphia, should they even bother trying to establish one? Look at how these teams gain and allow yardage and score points.
- Seattle gains 71.7% of its total yards via the pass, the ninth-highest ratio in the NFL.
- If you remove Russell Wilson's 401 rushing yards from Seattle's total yards number, their passing yards-to-rushing yards ratio would be 79.7%, which would be the highest ratio in the NFL.
- Philadelphia allows 77.7% of its total yardage via the pass, the highest ratio in the NFL.
- Seattle scores 51.9% of its total points via passing touchdowns, the third-highest ratio in the NFL.
- Philadelphia allows 44.0% of its total points via passing touchdowns, the 11th-highest ratio in the NFL.
- Philadelphia allows 3.5 yards per rush attempt, fourth-best in the NFL.
- Seattle gains 3.9 yards per rush attempt, ninth-worst in the NFL.
- If you remove Wilson's 65 rushes for 401 yards, Seattle's other players average 3.2 yards per rush, which would be second-worst in the NFL.
We showed in the "Funnel" section that Philadelphia pass-to-run ratios are caused by game script. But the way Seattle plays offense will lead to plenty of passing and little rushing, regardless of how this game goes. The other intriguing part of this game is the point spread. Though Philadelphia is the hottest team in the league and we saw Seattle lose their last primetime game at home, it's still a very difficult place to play. Seattle being a six-point underdog surprised me. Them winning this game outright would surprise me less.
Minnesota Vikings (at Atlanta Falcons)
Commentary
We've picked on Atlanta here before for their inability to stop pass-catching running backs. Atlanta is yielding 13.0 receiving fantasy points per game to running backs, fourth-most in the league. They allow 6.5 receptions per game to running backs, most in the NFL. Considering those factors and the game script (Atlanta is a home favorite), Jerick McKinnon is the better play of the Minnesota running back tandem (they are similar DFS prices). McKinnon makes for a GPP play in DFS and is flex-worthy in traditional PPR leagues.
At wide receiver, keep your eye on injury reports, as Desmond Trufant may sit out with a concussion sustained last week. This might make Stefon Diggs a palatable play as Trufant plays outside. But regardless, Adam Thielen surpassed Diggs as the more preferred and more productive target long ago.
| Week 8 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | |||||||||
| Player | Snaps | Tgts | Yds | Snaps | Tgts | Yds | Snaps | Tgts | Yds | Snaps | Tgts | Yds |
| Adam Thielen | 91.8% | 23.3% | 37.7% | 90.2% | 41.4% | 54.8% | 93.6% | 23.7% | 44.7% | 90.4% | 36.7% | 31.6% |
| Stefon Diggs | 75.3% | 14.0% | 10.4% | 83.6% | 17.2% | 25.7% | 67.9% | 15.8% | 11.6% | 90.4% | 23.3% | 23.4% |
| Team Total | 85 | 43 | 260 | 61 | 29 | 303 | 78 | 38 | 275 | 73 | 30 | 282 |
How Will They Score?
I have a confession. What you're about to see and read is not my idea. This is a concept created by Ben Gretch at Rotoviz and now published on FantasyLabs. However, it's one I wanted to share as it is an interesting way to think about how teams score and allow points and can lead to some surprise/contrarian lineup decisions. For some background, check the intro to Ben's Week 1 column from earlier this year, or get a bullet-point summary below.
- Take each team's implied Vegas team total
- Average the percentage of points that team scores via passing touchdowns and the percentage their opponent allows via passing touchdowns
- Multiply that average percentage by the implied total
- Do the same for rushing touchdowns
- An asterisk denotes a home team
- Passing + Rushing won't add up to the total. There are kicking and defense/specials teams points as well. However, those aren't as predictable, so we're focusing on offense only.
You'll get the hang of it with the help of the charts and some examples.
Passing Points
| Offense | Defense | LV Total | Off PaTD% | Def PaTD% | Pass Pts. |
| L.A. Chargers* | Cleveland Browns | 28.00 | 48.19% | 45.67% | 13.14 |
| Oakland Raiders* | New York Giants | 24.75 | 45.33% | 49.44% | 11.73 |
| Philadelphia Eagles | Seattle Seahawks* | 26.25 | 47.86% | 36.79% | 11.11 |
| Miami Dolphins* | Denver Broncos | 19.25 | 58.62% | 51.43% | 10.59 |
| Kansas City Chiefs | New York Jets* | 23.75 | 41.91% | 46.69% | 10.52 |
| New Orleans Saints* | Carolina Panthers | 26.00 | 29.81% | 49.28% | 10.28 |
| Green Bay Packers* | Tampa Bay Bucs | 22.75 | 46.55% | 43.51% | 10.24 |
| New England Patriots | Buffalo Bills* | 28.75 | 48.00% | 23.08% | 10.22 |
| Seattle Seahawks* | Philadelphia Eagles | 20.75 | 51.88% | 43.98% | 9.95 |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | Cincinnati Bengals* | 24.25 | 46.51% | 33.49% | 9.70 |
The surprising one here is Miami. With a total right above over 19 at opening, Miami is projected for nearly two touchdowns through the air. Denver allows plenty of production and targets to tight ends but very little to wide receivers. Julius Thomas isn't a bad desperation steamer in traditional leagues or intriguing contrarian play in DFS.
Oakland is another surprise appearance here, especially this high on the list. The Raiders will be without Michael Crabtree and likely without Amari Cooper. While Oakland's ratio of points scored is not aware those players won't be missing, the smart folks who set the lines and total are. Derek Carr and Jared Cook are good plays this weekend.
Rushing Points
| Offense | Defense | LV Total | Off RuTD | Def RuTD | Rush Pts. |
| New England Patriots | Buffalo Bills* | 28.75 | 14.77% | 36.92% | 7.43 |
| Jacksonville Jaguars* | Indianapolis Colts | 25.00 | 24.54% | 22.00% | 5.82 |
| Los Angeles Rams | Arizona Cardinals* | 26.25 | 20.06% | 23.74% | 5.75 |
| Tennessee Titans* | Houston Texans | 24.75 | 34.71% | 10.53% | 5.60 |
| Green Bay Packers* | Tampa Bay Bucs | 22.75 | 25.86% | 22.90% | 5.55 |
| New Orleans Saints* | Carolina Panthers | 26.00 | 29.81% | 11.59% | 5.38 |
| Philadelphia Eagles | Seattle Seahawks* | 26.25 | 15.38% | 25.47% | 5.36 |
| Baltimore Ravens* | Detroit Lions | 21.50 | 17.80% | 31.82% | 5.33 |
| Minnesota Vikings | Atlanta Falcons* | 22.25 | 26.57% | 20.87% | 5.28 |
| Atlanta Falcons* | Minnesota Vikings | 25.25 | 22.64% | 18.46% | 5.19 |
As mentioned in the New England section above, they will score a rushing touchdown or two this week. Talent, game script, and improving health all point to Leonard Fournette having a big game. It's bizarre seeing Seattle in a home game showing up on these lists, but the Philadelphia offense has been a machine. It wouldn't be surprising if Seattle pulled off that upset, though. Beware the road favorite in the NFL.
Questions, comments, suggestions, and other feedback on this piece are always welcome via e-mail hester@footballguys.com
