Footballguys continues to advance the world of fantasy football. With several additions to their offerings last year, the much heralded Best Online Content Site for 2009 joined the world of High Stakes Fantasy contests and made an instant splash. Joe Bryant and David Dodds teamed with David Gerczak and Alex Kaganovsky of the Fantasy Football Players Championship (myffpc.com) to create the first annual Footballguys Players Championship contest in 2010 and by all measures it was a huge success. Now the FPC and FFPC are back again for another season, ready to knock it out of the park once again in 2016.
By studying the rules of both the FFPC and the FPC along with some of the history and previous performances by FPC players, insights can be found that will help many players to not only compete well in both contests but also to be in a position to win their league and be in the running for a top prize in the championship round.
As the summer rolls on, I will continue analyzing many aspects of the Footballguys Players Championship and the Fantasy Football Players Championship. Through these articles I hope to provide extra help with fully understanding how to best build a top notch fantasy team within the contest. As someone who has competed against the best players in the world and in several contests much like the FPC and the FFPC, I fully understand how every possible advantage and extra edge can make all the difference in the world.
THE TIGHT END POSITION
Under the microscope this time around is the position of tight end. According the rules of the Footballguys Players Championship, the rosters are as follows:
Starting Roster
- 1 QB
- 2 RBs
- 2 WRs
- 1 TE
- 1 K
- 1 D/ST
- 2 flex players (RB/WR/TE)
With the following relevant scoring system in place:
- 4 points for passing TDs, 6 points for all other TDs
- 0.1 point for every 1 yard rushing or receiving
- 1.5 points per reception for TEs
Now, I have already discussed the impact of the 1.5 points per reception for TEs in a separate article here, so I will move on to focusing on fantasy scoring in general for tight ends.
So how do you analyze the impact of this scoring system to the current crop of potential fantasy tight ends? We need to dig into some numbers.
First, let's take a look at both the projected scores for the Top 30 tight ends this season and calculate some VBD numbers using the worst starter method (more on that in a minute). The results are in Table 1:
| Rank | Points | VBD | Rank | Points | VBD |
| 1 | 274.6 | 112 | 16 | 160.1 | -3 |
| 2 | 222.7 | 60 | 17 | 154.6 | -8 |
| 3 | 217.9 | 55 | 18 | 152.6 | -10 |
| 4 | 213.8 | 51 | 19 | 149 | -14 |
| 5 | 206.2 | 43 | 20 | 145.5 | -18 |
| 6 | 197.9 | 35 | 21 | 142.5 | -21 |
| 7 | 195.6 | 33 | 22 | 142 | -21 |
| 8 | 192.5 | 30 | 23 | 140.6 | -22 |
| 9 | 186.8 | 24 | 24 | 131.7 | -31 |
| 10 | 183.9 | 21 | 25 | 130.2 | -33 |
| 11 | 173.2 | 10 | 26 | 129.3 | -34 |
| 12 | 172.3 | 9 | 27 | 126.3 | -37 |
| 13 | 167.2 | 4 | 28 | 110.3 | -53 |
| 14 | 163 | 0 | 29 | 99.1 | -64 |
| 15 | 160.9 | -2 | 30 | 97.7 | -65 |
Table 1: FPC Projected Fantasy Points For Top 30 Tight Ends
First a comment on the worst starter method. Even though only 12 TEs are necessary as starters (the rules require 1 TE per team), the Dual Flex rule put more of them into play. As a result, the 14th tight end is regarded as the last starter - meaning that some teams will be going with a tight end as one of their two flex players, and possibly even two most weeks.
The VBD does not do much for a complete analysis without some context of other positions. Looking at the Draft Dominator, we can run a mock draft to get a feel for when the various tight ends are slated to come off of the draft board. Table 2 gives some more insight as to when the mock draft says to take a TE:
| Rank | Points | VBD | DD ADP | Rank | Points | VBD | DD ADP |
| 1 | 274.6 | 112 | 4 | 16 | 160.1 | -3 | 139 |
| 2 | 222.7 | 60 | 24 | 17 | 154.6 | -8 | 141 |
| 3 | 217.9 | 55 | 32 | 18 | 152.6 | -10 | 142 |
| 4 | 213.8 | 51 | 42 | 19 | 149 | -14 | 143 |
| 5 | 206.2 | 43 | 55 | 20 | 145.5 | -18 | 150 |
| 6 | 197.9 | 35 | 63 | 21 | 142.5 | -21 | 193 |
| 7 | 195.6 | 33 | 64 | 22 | 142 | -21 | 194 |
| 8 | 192.5 | 30 | 65 | 23 | 140.6 | -22 | 195 |
| 9 | 186.8 | 24 | 86 | 24 | 131.7 | -31 | 205 |
| 10 | 183.9 | 21 | 90 | 25 | 130.2 | -33 | 225 |
| 11 | 173.2 | 10 | 110 | 26 | 129.3 | -34 | 228 |
| 12 | 172.3 | 9 | 118 | 27 | 126.3 | -37 | 235 |
| 13 | 167.2 | 4 | 125 | 28 | 110.3 | -53 | 236 |
| 14 | 163 | 0 | 133 | 29 | 99.1 | -64 | 240+ |
| 15 | 160.9 | -2 | 135 | 30 | 97.7 | -65 | 240+ |
Table 2: Draft Dominator FPC Mock - ADP For Top 30 Tight Ends
Based on the results, one tight end, Rob Gronkowski, projects as a first round pick and the next two usually do not escape Round 3. After the first four TEs are gone, the second tier (TE5-8) normally go off the board before Round 6 is complete. Value shifts to other positions for the most part for several rounds, with just two tight ends selected before Round 10, but then a flurry of them go off the board until 19 tight ends are gone by the end of Round 12. This is where about half of the league would have their second tight end on the roster. Teams lacking in tight ends or depth at the position then would start to take the next few at about a clip of one or two per round and teams will likely have at least two tight ends on their rosters by the end of the draft.
This is great for a mock draft, but how about some real life comparisons? With the help of Clayton Gray here at Footballguys, we have pulled together some great ADP data based on early FPC drafts and created current ADP data for all of the top players. We can use this information to compare against the Draft Dominator mock results. Here are both ADPs compared side-by-side and their relative differences:
| Rank | FPC ADP | DD ADP | ADP Diff | Rank | FPC ADP | DD ADP | ADP Diff |
| 1 | 6 | 4 | -2 | 16 | 112 | 139 | 27 |
| 2 | 23 | 24 | 1 | 17 | 122 | 141 | 19 |
| 3 | 27 | 32 | 5 | 18 | 123 | 142 | 19 |
| 4 | 40 | 42 | 2 | 19 | 125 | 143 | 18 |
| 5 | 49 | 55 | 6 | 20 | 138 | 150 | 12 |
| 6 | 51 | 63 | 12 | 21 | 139 | 193 | 54 |
| 7 | 66 | 64 | -2 | 22 | 144 | 194 | 50 |
| 8 | 68 | 65 | -3 | 23 | 164 | 195 | 31 |
| 9 | 68 | 86 | 18 | 24 | 187 | 205 | 18 |
| 10 | 72 | 90 | 18 | 25 | 190 | 225 | 35 |
| 11 | 77 | 110 | 33 | 26 | 196 | 228 | 32 |
| 12 | 81 | 118 | 37 | 27 | 200 | 235 | 35 |
| 13 | 88 | 125 | 37 | 28 | 203 | 236 | 33 |
| 14 | 100 | 133 | 33 | 29 | 271 | 241 | -30 |
| 15 | 110 | 135 | 25 | 30 | 274 | 241 | -33 |
Table 3: Draft Dominator FPC Mock vs. 2016 FPC Data - Comparison of ADPs
Several key facts can be pulled from Table 3 about tight ends and FPC scoring:
- The top two tight ends go off the board right about where they should in both mocks, but then the next tier of TE3-6 come off the board about one-half to a full round earlier than the Draft Dominator predicted. That is a reflection of the gap between Rob Gronkowski and the next tier if tight ends, and then the rolloff in value for the third tier.
- Tight ends 7-8 go about where they should, but then the rush starts with TE9 and TE10 going about two rounds earlier than in the Draft Dominator mock. That speaks again to how valuable tight ends are in the FPC – or at least how valuable the tight end position is perceived.
- The next tier of tight ends (TE11-19) seem to go very early as well – almost too early. That points to the value of having two solid tight ends and the possibility of using one as a flex spot with the FPC roster rules.
- Most teams will take at least two tight ends and about a third of the franchises will draft three as the ADP results show an average of 27-28 TEs being selected.
- Both the mock draft and the FPC ADP have 28 tight ends selected (hence the ADP over 240 for the Draft Dominator for TE29 and TE30).
PARTING THOUGHTS
Every fantasy league and its rulebook are a little different. For the FPC and the FFPC, the tight end position has many reasons to emphasize drafting them early and often. With the Dual Flex, up to three tight ends can start in a given week, and with 1.5 points per reception their value is bumped up a little across the board. Having the flexibility to start 2-3 in a given week - especially with bye weeks - is a nice option to have.
So what is the right approach? Taking the tight end (Gronkowski) seems too expensive when you look at the price you will have to pay (a certain Round 1 pick) and the added cost of not getting a Top 5 RB or WR instead - unless you can steal Rob Gronkowski in Round 2 or Greg Olsen in Round 3. While the Draft Dominator mock hints that all tight ends are reaches, the thing to take away from it is that the best value picks occur for the second group of the TE1s (TE2-TE8). Grabbing a Gary Barnidge, Zach Ertz, Tyler Eifert or similar tight end in Round 5 or 6 when 5-7 tight ends have already been selected is a great idea and a good approach to an FPC draft. Another solid idea is to not wait on TE2, as they will dry up quickly after Rounds 10-12. Snagging two Top 15 or so tight ends gives stability and performance for your team and allows you roster flexibility when it comes to both bye weeks and the Dual Flex roster options.
It takes a little time to get your mind wrapped around a new contest with a new set of rules, but the time spent is often well worth it if the goal is to field a competitive team. Giving a little bit of effort to get a greater understanding of the twists and turns to the rulebook can give turn a good fantasy player into a great one and a great player into a dominant force. Knowledge is power - so be as powerful as you can!
Questions, suggestions and comments are always welcome to pasquino@footballguys.com.
