FanDuel GPP Guide: Week 4

Dan Hindery's FanDuel GPP Guide: Week 4 Dan Hindery Published 09/30/2023

The key to success in Week 4 FanDuel tournaments is going to be identifying the less popular plays with slate-winning upside and combining those players with the “good chalk” to construct winning lineups.

Over the past few weeks, my focus has been on refining and improving my simulation model based on Footballguys consensus projections. My method separates production into two separate factors. First, we analyze and simulate team-level passing, rushing, and receiving fantasy production based on both base productions and historical standard deviations. We also simulate the variance in each player’s share of team production in each category. Simulating the slate 1,000 times and generating an optimal lineup from each simulation and then counting how many times each player shows up in those 1,000 optimal lineups gives a good idea of which players have the most realistic upside. It gives us some percent rostered targets for our builds that we can then compare to Devin Knotts’ Percent Rostered Projections to determine the players at each position who are going overlooked. Throughout this week’s article, we are going to be especially focused on highlighting the spots where our numbers like players more than the we think the field will land.

Quarterback

Player Optimal Salary Team Opponent Ownership Gap
Josh Allen 9.5% $9,000 BUF MIA 10.2% -0.7%
Jalen Hurts 8.9% $8,800 PHI WAS 9.7% -0.8%
Tua Tagovailoa 8.4% $8,000 MIA BUF 5.7% 2.7%
Anthony Richardson 8.1% $7,600 IND LAR 6.7% 1.4%
Justin Herbert 6.6% $8,600 LAC LV 7.2% -0.6%
Joe Burrow 5.9% $7,200 CIN TEN 2.4% 3.5%
Kirk Cousins 5.8% $7,900 MIN CAR 10.3% -4.5%
Bryce Young 5.7% $6,800 CAR MIN 1.0% 4.7%
Deshaun Watson 5.2% $7,100 CLE BAL 5.8% -0.6%
Sam Howell 3.9% $6,900 WAS PHI 0.2% 3.7%
Jameis Winston 3.3% $6,500 NO TB 1.4% 1.9%
Justin Fields 3.2% $7,200 CHI DEN 6.8% -3.6%
C.J. Stroud 3.1% $6,700 HOU PIT 3.9% -0.8%
Jimmy Garoppolo 3.1% $6,900 LV LAC 1.7% 1.4%
Russell Wilson 3.0% $7,500 DEN CHI 2.6% 0.4%
Dak Prescott 2.5% $7,000 DAL NE 5.5% -3.0%
Ryan Tannehill 2.5% $6,300 TEN CIN 1.0% 1.5%
Baker Mayfield 2.5% $7,000 TB NO 0.9% 1.6%
Lamar Jackson 2.3% $8,200 BAL CLE 5.9% -3.6%
Brock Purdy 2.2% $7,100 SF ARI 1.9% 0.3%
Matthew Stafford 1.7% $6,600 LA IND 4.0% -2.3%
Mac Jones 1.3% $6,800 NE DAL 0.5% 0.8%
Joshua Dobbs 0.7% $6,400 ARI SF 0.2% 0.5%
Kenny Pickett 0.6% $6,800 PIT HOU 4.7% -4.1%

In the table above, the Optimal column shows how often each player showed up in the optimal lineup of my 1,000 simulations. This is a good method to determine what percentage a player should be rostered at. We see a lot of the usual suspects at the top of the list, led by Josh Allen and Jalen Hurts. However, this is not the end of our analysis. We also need to compare how often a player should be rostered to how often we actually expect each player to be rostered in FanDuel tournaments this weekend. The Ownership is how popular each player is expected to be based upon Devin Knotts' percent rostered projections. Both Allen and Hurts are expected to be rostered in about the same percentage of lineups as they should be. That makes them solid plays despite their chalky status. On the other hand, both Kirk Cousins and Justin Fields are expected to be popular but do not project well enough in my model to justify their popularity. Both look like bad chalk, appearing in optimal lineups about half as often as their ownership projections would indicate they should. There are also some players who are expected to be less popular than they should be (see Gap column). The biggest gap this week is between how often a player appeared in optimal lineups of my sims is Bryce Young who was in 5.7% of optimals but is only projected to be 0.5% rostered.

Top Plays

Anthony Richardson, Colts ($7,600)

  • The best way to put Richardson’s incredible fantasy start into context is this stat:

    Richardson had a big Week 1 (21.9 FanDuel points) and was on his way to a monster performance in Week 2 with 17.7 fantasy points in just 18 snaps before being knocked out with a concussion. The sample size here is small (1.3 games), but we knew coming into the season that Richardson had elite fantasy upside, as a freakish athlete in a fantasy-friendly system.

  • The Colts will be without two starting offensive linemen (LT Bernhard Raimann and C Ryan Kelly), which adds more risk to this play. It is less comfortable to play Richardson than it is to click the button for some of the more proven commodities at the position. However, that hesitation is where the potential edge comes in. We know there is a strong chance (roughly 8%) that Richardson is the top performer at the position, but he is expected to be less popular than that, which is the definition of good chalk.

Josh Allen, Bills ($8,800)

Share This Article

Featured Articles

More by Dan Hindery

 

Dynasty Trade Value Chart: July

Dan Hindery

Quantifying Long-term Player Values

07/03/25 Read More
 

Dynasty Trade Value Chart: June

Dan Hindery

Long-term player values and dynasty trade targets

06/03/25 Read More
 

Dynasty Trade Value Chart: May

Dan Hindery

Long-term player values for dynasty leagues

05/02/25 Read More
 

Dynasty Trade Value Chart: April

Dan Hindery

Long-Term Player Values for Dynasty Leagues

04/04/25 Read More
 

Stock Up, Stock Down: How the NFL Combine Moved Rookie ADP

Dan Hindery

Post-Combine ADP movement in Underdog Best Ball Drafts

03/10/25 Read More
 

Dynasty Trade Value Chart: March

Dan Hindery

Dynasty trade value can fluctuate; our Dan Hindery has this month's update for your dynasty leagues.

03/05/25 Read More