Raiders owner Mark Davis and his new head coach Jon Gruden are the Dumb and Dumber of the NFL. They have the haircuts, and according to many fantasy analysts that I respect, they've earned the role for their off-season acquisitions:
- Signing 32-year-old Jordy Nelson.
- Acquiring twice-suspended Doug Martin to back up 31-year-old Marshawn Lynch.
- Trading for twice-suspended Martavis Bryant.
- Giving up a 7th-round pick for Jets quarterback Christian Hackenberg.
- Cutting top punter Marquette King.
Marshawn Lynch Still has it and Oakland will lean on it
Lynch dealt with a back issue the season leading up to his retirement. After a year away, Lynch returned in 2017 and finished the year the No. 18 fantasy back in standard leagues. Lynch remained healthy the entire season, earning a one-game suspension for unsportsmanlike conduct.
During the final seven weeks of 2017, Lynch earned RB1 fantasy totals as the No. 12 back in standard 12-team leagues with 121 carries, 568 yards, 3 rushing touchdowns, 14 receptions, and 108 yards. Only three backs in the NFL earned more carries than Lynch during this span.
However, Lynch was 17th among backs in carries during the first 10 weeks of 2017. Former head coach Jack Del Rio was cautious about using Lynch and didn't ramp up the workload until the Raiders were already in severe danger of elimination from the playoffs.
Del Rio did not buy into using Lynch as the weapon he's capable of being for an offense. Now Del Rio is gone and Gruden appears all-in.
And there's a good reason for Gruden committing. Lynch only got better as the season progressed, but even this fourth-down run on opening day is a great example of his agility, vision, and balance.
This trucking of Jurrell Casey is also a testament to Lynch's explosive power and quickness remaining intact from a year-long layoff.
This is vintage Beast Mode. The biggest question about Lynch isn't whether he still has it but whether Oakland is prepared to use him like a bell cow. Based on the offseason decisions of the Raiders and an interview with one of its key acquisitions, I think the answer is yes.
The intersection point for this answer is Doug Martin. The Buccaneers runner wore out his welcome in Tampa Bay, but when the Buccaneers offensive line had an effective game, Martin still looked like the top talent that he is.
The decision for Oakland to acquire Martin speaks volumes to its intent as an offense. When the Raiders signed Lynch last year, it only had scat backs Jalen Richard and DeAndre Washington on Oakland's depth chart.
Martin is an excellent redundancy plan for the Raiders that Oakland never had in 2017. With Martin, Gruden's offense can remain committed to the run if Lynch falters. Strictly in terms of skills, Lynch and Martin are one of the best 1-2 combinations on any running back depth chart in the league.
Last year, Oakland also used its tight end Jared Cook as a lead blocker from an H-Back position with a lot of spread sets. Cook is a competent blocker in certain sets but he wins with finesse. Although Oakland's line is a physical bunch that remains intact for the 2018 season, the offensive alignments in 2017 didn't maximize the potential for a power running game.
This year, Gruden released Jamize Olawale and signed Keith Smith, a former linebacker-turned-fullback who was a special teams ace in Dallas. Olawale was a better runner and receiver than lead blocker. Smith will dig out tree roots if needed.
Lynch's best seasons in the NFL came with a fullback as a significant part of the offense. In a story for Silver And Black Pride, Gruden essentially described Lynch as the feature back. When asked about his role in the same article, the author dropped some worthwhile information about the Buccaneers offensive line before Martin answered a question about his usage in Oakland.
The blocking starts up front with the Raiders having one of the league’s best lines and extends to that of blocking tight ends and full backs; positions the Raiders have also added in the past couple days of free agency.
The past couple years, Martin has struggled with injuries and an an offensive line that had one of the lowest yards before contact averages in the league (1.71) according to Pro Football Focus figures. Martin figures to get more space with the Raiders’ elite interior line than he did in Tampa and as he said that also played a role in why he wanted to be in Oakland.
It gives him his best chance of rebounding from consecutive seasons in which he averaged just 2.9 yards per carry. Quite a departure from the 2015 season in which he surpassed 1400 yards and was named All Pro.
Most of his career, Martin was the featured back. In Oakland he is likely to take a backseat to Marshawn Lynch.
“Marshawn’s a great back,” said Martin. “He’s definitely made his mark in this league and whatever role that they want me to play, I’m willing to play it. I’m not sure how many carries I’ll be getting and how many carries we’ll be splitting, but whatever I need to do to help the team, I’m gonna do it.”
One of Martin's greatest problems in Tampa Bay that forced the team to lose patience with him is that he tried too hard to make big plays when the offensive line struggled to open the intended creases. Although Peyton Barber lacks the caliber of Martin's talent, he and Jacquizz Rodgers were more dutiful at creating yards with efficient decisions and not losing discipline as the line lost its effectiveness.
Martin will get carries this year, but he's essentially the insurance that Oakland can pound the ball in ways that didn't fit the profiles of Richard and Washingon. Look for Lynch to be the feature back with Martin as the change of pace and insurance policy for Lynch.
The bigger question is...
Will it work in 2018?
The base defense in the NFL is the nickel front—four linemen, two linebackers, and a nickel defensive back (usually a cornerback). This base unit accounts for the proliferation of three- and four-receiver sets. Linebackers are lighter and faster to win in nickel units.
Safeties also have more range and less bulk than their predecessors. The in-box safeties are less common in the NFL since the early 2000s.
The best players on most team defenses are those suited for nickel personnel as described above. There isn't a lot of money invested in players who are great box safeties. Defenses aren't stacked with big linebackers who can withstand an onslaught of a committed power running game.
In this sense, Gruden and the Raiders are attacking the inherent weakness of recent trends with NFL defenses in the same way that Super Bowl teams Seattle, San Francisco, Baltimore succeeded between 2012-2015.
This isn't ancient NFL history. These teams took the contrarian route and overpowered the opposition:
Contrarian Super Bowl Contenders 2012-2015
| Team | Rushing Yards | Y/A | Attempts |
| 2012 Ravens | 12th | 11th | 12th |
| 2012 49ers | 7th | 4th | 3rd |
| 2013 49ers | 3rd | 11th | 3rd |
| 2013 Seahawks | 4th | 12th | 2nd |
| 2014 Seahawks | 1st | 1st | 2nd |
| 2014 49ers | 9th | 4th | 4th |
| 2015 Seahawks | 3rd | 7th | 3rd |
The Ravens had top-10 figures in 2011 in each of these categories. 2011 and 2012 were the final two years where Ray Rice was a productive and relevant figure on the field. Baltimore also had an excellent lead blocker in fullback Vonta Leach.
The 49ers and Seahawks were fullback-oriented teams and they were the two most relevant teams in the NFL between 2012 and 2014. What's most important isn't the Yards Per Attempt but Yards and Attempts. Running the ball for these teams was about intent and volume. The efficiency matters to a degree but it doesn't have to be top tier if the team can remain in game scripts to continue running the ball consistently.
During this time, the hybrid player revolution on offense was in full swing and defenses were already adjusting. According to Pro Football Focus the percentage of pays where NFL defenses used at least five defensive backs increased for 43.4 percent in 2008 to 63.4 percent in 2015. Between 2012 and 2015, defenses were already in nickel for a majority of its snaps and nearly two-thirds of the time in 2014 and 2015.
Although Marshawn Lynch performed well and the Raiders offensive line scored well as a unit, the team was 30th in Attempts, 25th in Yards, and 13th in Yards Per Attempt. Oakland had the tools but lacked the commitment.
In theory, if Oakland commits and succeeds with the run, there will be a lot less pressure on the Raiders defense, and the unit can be the aggressor with its capable pass rush. In practice, the Raiders lacked the upper-echelon pass defenses of the 49ers and Seahawks—Oakland was in the bottom-third of passing defenses last year.
Most will examine Oakland's bottom-feeder defensive production allowed and conclude that the Raiders defense won't allow the Raiders offense to remain committed to the run. However, this isn't an unassailable truth.
The Ravens were in the bottom-third of passing defenses during its Super Bowl season. It's not an automatic that Oakland's passing defense must significantly improve to help the ground game thrive. If the Raiders can dictate on offense, build early leads, and force opponents to play catch-up, Oakland can still thrive.
In fact, the Raiders can give up a lot of yards through the air and still become a top ground game and a winning team. If Oakland can take early leads, control the ball, and create favorable game scripts that force opposing offenses to play in catch-up mode, Oakland's defense will look different when playing with a lead.
Last year, Oakland was behind by more than a touchdown by the end of the half or by the beginning of the fourth quarter in six of its nine losses. This alters game scripts. Here's a comparison of Lynch's 2017 workload and production by quarter versus the average of the top-5 fantasy backs:
Average of Top-5 Fantasy RB Stat Splits (2017)
| Top-RB Avg 2017 | QTR | Att. | Yds. | Y/A | Rush TDs | Targets | Rec. | Rec Yds. | YPC | Rec TDs | Fpts |
| 1st | 67.8 | 313 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 20.2 | 14.6 | 122 | 8.4 | 0.6 | 61.5 | |
| 2nd | 57.6 | 260 | 4.5 | 3.2 | 32.8 | 23.6 | 226.2 | 9.6 | 1.2 | 75 | |
| 3rd | 67.2 | 294.2 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 21.4 | 16.8 | 166.2 | 9.2 | 1.2 | 66.4 | |
| 4th | 75 | 337.2 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 21.2 | 17.4 | 160.8 | 9.2 | 1.4 | 69 |
The only places where Lynch was within the same range as the top-5 fantasy backs were attempts and yards during the first quarter of games and his yards per average throughout the game. His yards-per-carry average was actually better than the average of the top-5 running backs in the first quarter of games.
Marshawn Lynch's 2017 RB Stat Splits
| Marshawn Lynch 2017 | QTR | Att. | Yds. | Y/A | Rush TDs | Targets | Rec. | Rec Yds. | YPC | Rec TDs | Fpts |
| 1st | 62 | 298 | 4.8 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.8 | |
| 2nd | 49 | 212 | 4.3 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 0 | 37.5 | |
| 3rd | 51 | 226 | 4.4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 0 | 38.5 | |
| 4th | 45 | 194 | 4.3 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 70 | 8.8 | 0 | 34.5 |
Oakland's line and running back was good enough to dictate to opposing defenses last year. However, the play calling, the defense, and the passing game weren't good enough to let the Raiders dictate the game with the run.
If the Raiders can decrease the number of first-half and fourth-quarter deficits, Lynch and Doug Martin have potential to become excellent contrarian fantasy plays in 2018. Lynch is leaving draft boards as the 36th running back taken in the early 8th round and Martin is going in the middle of the 13th round as the 57th running back.
The risk on these two is minimal, Gruden's intent to use the run game is strong, and the offense has the tools to make it happen. The key will be the offense taking pressure off the defense early enough that the defense can play and pressure opponents with leads.
Next week, we'll examine Gruden's acquisitions of Jordy Nelson and Martavis Bryant, why what they were to their previous teams should remain in the past, and why it makes their immediate future potentially brighter than characterized.
